IPXL Holdings LLC, v. Amazon.com, Inc. IPXL Holdings, LLC., v. Amazon.com, Inc., 430 F.3d 1377, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, Fed. Cir., 2005: Court agreed with Amazon that the Plaintiff’s patent claims were invalid and there was no infringement. 430 F.3d 1377 IPXL HOLDINGS, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMAZON.COM, […]
Read more →Telebuyer LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Telebuyer, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-1677-BJR, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. of Wash., 2015 – The case was dismissed in favor of Amazon because the claims in plaintiff’s patents were abstract, generic and indefinite, and therefore invalid. TELEBUYER, LLC, Plaintiff, AMAZON.COM, INC., […]
Read more →United Video Props. Inc. V. Amazon.Com, Inc. UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, LLC, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, INC., Plaintiffs, AMAZON.COM, INC. AND IMDB.COM, INC., Defendants-Appellees. 2013-1396 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Decided: April 8, 2014 United Video Props., Inc. […]
Read more →M-Edge Accessories v. Amazon.com, Inc M-Edge Accessories v. Amazon.com, Inc, No. MJG-11-3332, U.S. Dist. Ct. MD, 2015: Amazon was able to get one of two patent infringement claims dismissed where the Court had no question that Amazon’s bookcover did not infringe upon Plaintiff’s patent. M-EDGE ACCESSORIES LLC Plaintiff […]
Read more →Amazon.com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble.com Amazon.com v. Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., No. C99-1695P. United States District Court, W.D. Washington. December 1, 1999 This is a patent infringement suit brought by Amazon.com, Inc. against barnesandnoble.com. The patent in question is United States Patent No. 5,960,411 (the ‘411 patent), which was issued on […]
Read more →