Milo & Gabby, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Milo & Gabby, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., NO. C13-1932RSM, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. of Wash., 2015: Plaintiff lost because Amazon was protected from infringement of third-party vendor’s under the DMCA. Issue: Did Amazon commit IP infringement via third-party vendors […]
Read more →
Corbis Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Corbis Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. CV03-1415L, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. Washington, 2004: Amazon is protected from liability under the DMCA for copyright infringement occurring on its third party vendor platform. Corbis Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. CV03-1415L, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. […]
Read more →
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 9th Cir., 2007: Amazon did not directly infringe, nor was it vicariously liable for infringement of third parties when it did not have control over third parties’ […]
Read more →
Sandy Routt v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Sandy Routt v. Amazon.com, Inc. NO. C12-1307 JLR, U.S. Dist. Ct., Western Dist. of Wash, 2012: Amazon did not directly infringe, had no supervision over third-party’s infringing activities to be vicariously liable, and did not induce or encourage the infringement to be contributorily […]
Read more →Gary Gerlinger v. Amazon.com, Inc. Gary Gerlinger v. Amazon.com, Inc., 311 F.Supp.2d 838, U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., 2004: Court found Plaintiff’s raised a triable issue as to whether Amazon’s agreement with Borders had an anti-competitive effect on commerce. 311 F.Supp.2d 838 Gary GERLINGER, individually, on behalf of […]
Read more →