Sanmedica International, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. Sanmedica International, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00169-DN, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. of Utah, Central Div., 2015: Court refused to grant Amazon’s motion to dismiss where it found the use of Plaintiff’s trademark may cause initial interest confusion and this was […]
Read more →Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon loses: Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 13-55575, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 9th Cir., 2015: Plaintiff successfully argued that Amazon could have confused customers – Plaintiff did not sell items on Amazon, but when customers searched for it, Amazon […]
Read more →Corbis Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Corbis Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. CV03-1415L, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. Washington, 2004: Amazon is protected from liability under the DMCA for copyright infringement occurring on its third party vendor platform. Corbis Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. CV03-1415L, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. […]
Read more →Sandy Routt v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Sandy Routt v. Amazon.com, Inc. NO. C12-1307 JLR, U.S. Dist. Ct., Western Dist. of Wash, 2012: Amazon did not directly infringe, had no supervision over third-party’s infringing activities to be vicariously liable, and did not induce or encourage the infringement to be contributorily […]
Read more →M-Edge Accessories v. Amazon.com, Inc M-Edge Accessories v. Amazon.com, Inc, No. MJG-11-3332, U.S. Dist. Ct. MD, 2015: Amazon was able to get one of two patent infringement claims dismissed where the Court had no question that Amazon’s bookcover did not infringe upon Plaintiff’s patent. M-EDGE ACCESSORIES LLC Plaintiff […]
Read more →