Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 9th Cir., 2007: Amazon did not directly infringe, nor was it vicariously liable for infringement of third parties when it did not have control over third parties’ […]
Read more →
Sandy Routt v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Sandy Routt v. Amazon.com, Inc. NO. C12-1307 JLR, U.S. Dist. Ct., Western Dist. of Wash, 2012: Amazon did not directly infringe, had no supervision over third-party’s infringing activities to be vicariously liable, and did not induce or encourage the infringement to be contributorily […]
Read more →
Daniel E. Ricchio v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Daniel E. Ricchio v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 12-CV-00332, U.S. Dist. Ct, E.D. Wisc., 2012: Court ruled in favor of Amazon and held that Plaintiff was not entitled to profits from resale of his book by third parties. Daniel E. Ricchio […]
Read more →Gary Gerlinger v. Amazon.com, Inc. Gary Gerlinger v. Amazon.com, Inc., 311 F.Supp.2d 838, U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., 2004: Court found Plaintiff’s raised a triable issue as to whether Amazon’s agreement with Borders had an anti-competitive effect on commerce. 311 F.Supp.2d 838 Gary GERLINGER, individually, on behalf of […]
Read more →
IPXL Holdings LLC, v. Amazon.com, Inc. IPXL Holdings, LLC., v. Amazon.com, Inc., 430 F.3d 1377, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, Fed. Cir., 2005: Court agreed with Amazon that the Plaintiff’s patent claims were invalid and there was no infringement. 430 F.3d 1377 IPXL HOLDINGS, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMAZON.COM, […]
Read more →