Telebuyer LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Telebuyer, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-1677-BJR, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. of Wash., 2015 – The case was dismissed in favor of Amazon because the claims in plaintiff’s patents were abstract, generic and indefinite, and therefore invalid. TELEBUYER, LLC, Plaintiff, AMAZON.COM, INC., […]
Read more →United Video Props. Inc. V. Amazon.Com, Inc. UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, LLC, AND TV GUIDE ONLINE, INC., Plaintiffs, AMAZON.COM, INC. AND IMDB.COM, INC., Defendants-Appellees. 2013-1396 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Decided: April 8, 2014 United Video Props., Inc. […]
Read more →Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc. Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc., 730 F.Supp.2d 333, U.S. Dist. Ct. Del., 2010: Amazon successfully argued against an order that would require them to permanently halt its infringing activities or pay an ongoing royalty to patent owners. 730 F.Supp.2d 333 CORDANCE CORPORATION, […]
Read more →M-Edge Accessories v. Amazon.com, Inc M-Edge Accessories v. Amazon.com, Inc, No. MJG-11-3332, U.S. Dist. Ct. MD, 2015: Amazon was able to get one of two patent infringement claims dismissed where the Court had no question that Amazon’s bookcover did not infringe upon Plaintiff’s patent. M-EDGE ACCESSORIES LLC Plaintiff […]
Read more →Fagerstrom and Wiseley v. Amazon Andrea Fagerstrom and Allen Wiseley v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 15-cv-96-BAS-DHB, U.S. Dist. Ct., Southern Dist. of Cal., 2015: Court agreed with Amazon and enforced Arbitration clause of agreement entered into between Amazon and Plaintiff prior to Plaintiff selling on Amazon’s website. Andrea […]
Read more →