Gary Gerlinger v. Amazon.com, Inc. Gary Gerlinger v. Amazon.com, Inc., 311 F.Supp.2d 838, U.S. Dist. Ct., N.D. Cal., 2004: Court found Plaintiff’s raised a triable issue as to whether Amazon’s agreement with Borders had an anti-competitive effect on commerce. 311 F.Supp.2d 838 Gary GERLINGER, individually, on behalf of […]
Read more →IPXL Holdings LLC, v. Amazon.com, Inc. IPXL Holdings, LLC., v. Amazon.com, Inc., 430 F.3d 1377, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, Fed. Cir., 2005: Court agreed with Amazon that the Plaintiff’s patent claims were invalid and there was no infringement. 430 F.3d 1377 IPXL HOLDINGS, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMAZON.COM, […]
Read more →Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc. Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc., 730 F.Supp.2d 333, U.S. Dist. Ct. Del., 2010: Amazon successfully argued against an order that would require them to permanently halt its infringing activities or pay an ongoing royalty to patent owners. 730 F.Supp.2d 333 CORDANCE CORPORATION, […]
Read more →M-Edge Accessories v. Amazon.com, Inc M-Edge Accessories v. Amazon.com, Inc, No. MJG-11-3332, U.S. Dist. Ct. MD, 2015: Amazon was able to get one of two patent infringement claims dismissed where the Court had no question that Amazon’s bookcover did not infringe upon Plaintiff’s patent. M-EDGE ACCESSORIES LLC Plaintiff […]
Read more →Amazon.com v. American Dynasty Insurance Amazon.Com International, Inc. v. American Dynasty Surplus Lines Insurance Company, 85 P.3d 974, 120 Wash. App. 610, 2004. Amazon could not hold excess coverage carrier liable to defend it in lawsuit when primary carrier covers the injury Amazon is sued for. Procedure: Software […]
Read more →