Handheld Products, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon Wins: Handheld Products, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No.: 12-768-RGA-MPT, U.S. Dist. Ct. Del., 2014: In order to infringe upon a patent, the actions taken must follow the same sequence or order of actions outlined in the patent. Handheld Products, Inc. […]
Read more →Basis Technology Corp. v. Amazon.Com, Inc. Basis Technology Corp. v. Amazon.Com, Inc., No. 06-P-1048, Appeals Ct. MA, 2008: Plaintiff successfully argued that an enforceable settlement had been reached via e-mail exchanges that were read for the record in court. Issue: The enforceability of a disputed midtrial settlement agreement […]
Read more →Milo & Gabby, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon wins: Milo & Gabby, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., NO. C13-1932RSM, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. of Wash., 2015: Plaintiff lost because Amazon was protected from infringement of third-party vendor’s under the DMCA. Issue: Did Amazon commit IP infringement via third-party vendors […]
Read more →Sanmedica International, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. Sanmedica International, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00169-DN, U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. of Utah, Central Div., 2015: Court refused to grant Amazon’s motion to dismiss where it found the use of Plaintiff’s trademark may cause initial interest confusion and this was […]
Read more →Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon loses: Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 13-55575, U.S. Ct. of Appeals, 9th Cir., 2015: Plaintiff successfully argued that Amazon could have confused customers – Plaintiff did not sell items on Amazon, but when customers searched for it, Amazon […]
Read more →